What’s Next For EU Sustainability Policy? – Corporate and Company Law
GT
Grant Thornton Malta
In a surprising move on 22 October 2025, the European Parliament rejected the mandate for the proposed Omnibus Regulation, creating a pause in the EU’s sustainability reform agenda.
European Union
Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Grant Thornton Malta are most popular:
- within Employment and HR, Immigration and Privacy topic(s)
- in European Union
- with readers working within the Banking & Credit industries
In a surprising move on 22 October 2025, the European Parliament
rejected the mandate for the proposed Omnibus Regulation, creating
a pause in the EU’s sustainability reform agenda. The proposal
will now return to the plenary session on 11–13 November,
where Members of Parliament will debate and vote on the package in
full and possibly reopen parts of it for amendment. The rejection
highlights growing political tensions around the future of EU
sustainability legislation and raises critical questions about the
direction of the European Green Deal.
What happened at the vote?
Parliament voted against giving the green light to move the
Omnibus compromise forward, meaning the proposal will undergo
another round of discussion in November. This decision has added a
layer of uncertainty to the legislative process. Instead of being
fast-tracked, it now heads back to plenary, where it will be
debated and voted on in full. A new deadline for amendments will be
set, which means parts of the compromise could be reopened,
potentially reshaping the proposal. This also risks delaying
progress and unravelling agreements that had already been
reached.
What is the Omnibus Regulation?
Introduced by the European Commission on 26 February 2025, the
Omnibus package is a simplification initiative aimed at easing
compliance with the EU’s sustainability framework.
It proposes amendments to three cornerstone laws of the European
Green Deal:

The main objective is to reduce reporting burdens, particularly
for mid-sized companies, while maintaining consistency and
competitiveness in the EU’s sustainability agenda.
Key changes proposed
1. CSRD
The Omnibus proposes a narrower scope for CSRD, limiting
mandatory reporting to companies with:

As a result…

2. EU TAXONOMY
- Reduced scope aligned with CSRD thresholds.
- Gradual adoption through partial alignment.
- Materiality thresholds (e.g., 10% of turnover or assets).
- Simplified DNSH criteria and fewer reporting templates.
2. CSDDD
The directive’s scope is significantly reduced to companies
with:

These proposals were intended to shift the focus from the
quantity of reporting to its quality and proportionality — an
aim that will now be reconsidered as Parliament revisits the file
in November.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
link
